Template:Short description Template:Good article Template:Use mdy dates Template:Infobox artwork Artist's Studio—Look Mickey (sometimes Artist's Studio, Look Mickey, Artist's Studio – Look Mickey or Artist's Studio No. 1 (Look Mickey)) is a 1973 painting by Roy Lichtenstein. It is one of five large-scale studio interior paintings in a series.[1] The series is either referred to as the Artist's Studio series or more colloquially as the Studios and sometimes is described as excluding the other 1973 painting, reducing the series to four.
The series refers to a set of works by Henri Matisse, with this work specifically referring to L'Atelier Rouge. The work incorporates several other Lichtenstein works and gets its name from the large portion of Lichtenstein's Look Mickey that is included. Lichtenstein used a much more realistic representation of his own works than is standard for most artists. Elements of the work also refer to works from both Fernand Léger and Matisse.
Background
Lichtenstein's studios reference what are known as Matisse's four Symphonic Interiors of 1911 (The Pink Studio, The Painter's Family, Interior with Eggplants, The Red Studio) and an earlier Matisse The Dance.[1] Artist's Studio—Look Mickey[1] was part of a series that included The Artist's Studio – with Model,[2] 1974, Artist's Studio, Foot Medication,[3] 1974, Artist's Studio, the "Dance",[1] 1974, Artist's Studio/A Still Life, 1973. Artist's Studio—Look Mickey was the only one of the five to include a corner of the room, like The Red Studio.[1] Many sources, including Lichtenstein himself only include four works in the series (excluding Artist's Studio/A Still Life, 1973). In a 1995 lecture in conjunction with the Kyoto Prize, he said "I did a series of four large, about 8' x10', paintings of interiors of artists' studios. They were inspired by Matisse's paintings..."[4] Artist's Studio—Look Mickey is regarded as the first of the four Artist's Studio works.[5] From among the Artist's Studio series works, this depicts "the deepest, most plainly articulated interior space."[6]
Description
The work, which is in part a retrospective, "conflated early modernism with emergent postmodernism".[7] Lichtenstein refers to some of his paintings, including Look Mickey in this work, which depicts his own studio as the ideal studio and implies that the public consensus ratifies his choice of popular culture subject matter.[8] The series depicts individual Lichtenstein works as well as groups of works in closed room that is devoid of paint brushes or easels.[9] The series served as a review of Lichtenstein's post 1961 work, with objects of his prior works decorating the room as furnishings.[9] In Artist's Studio—Look Mickey, the couch, door, wall frieze, telephone and fruit all are drawn from earlier works and serve this setting as interior decoration, while Look Mickey is almost presented undisturbed in its entirety.[10] Less notable works include the mirror and the Trompe-l'œil painting of the rear side of the canvas.[10] Two other paintings were works in progress at the time of this work and one became a painting within a year after the completion of this work: the gull and the dune landscape. The speech balloon was never produced as a separate work.[10] However, its juxtaposition to the speech balloon from Donald Duck is intriguing.[11] He references his Entablatures works as ceiling molding.[12]
Lichtenstein's approach to presenting his own works within his works was non-traditional. The works were revisited as exact duplicates rather than the more standard distanced revisitation. This choice of exact duplication contrary to popular practice intrigued Lichtenstein.[4] Lichtenstein liked this quality of his paintings within his paintings, saying "I like the combination of a very separate quality that each of my paintings has within the painting, and the fact that everything works as one painting too."[13] In fact, Lichtenstein commented on this as an attempt to eliminate any modulation:
The Studio series was inspired by Matisse paintings, and Diane Waldman claims that this particular effort was modelled upon Matisse's L'Atelier Rouge (The Red Studio),[14][15] although the Lichtenstein Foundation website credits two other Matisse works as inspiration as well as Fernand Léger's The Baluster, 1925, which is represented in the far right corner.[16] Léger was one of Lichtenstein's closest friends.[14] By incorporating Matisse in his own studio setting, Lichtenstein is perceived as presenting himself as Matisse's peer and in so doing repositions pop art as a historical style rather than a contemporary one.[7]
A sketch for this work demonstrates Lichtenstein's original intent to incorporate a "plant-in-vessel arrangement" as well as fruit on the table, but these Matisse references were instead depicted on the floor of the studio.[17] The table instead includes the telephone from Lichtenstein's own R-R-R-R-Ring!! with differences from the original that amount to puns. In the original, Lichtenstein depicted sound with motion lines that present a pronounced movement of the object. This contrasts with the same phone in the studio setting in "perfect stasis", which contributes to the pacific still life setting.[17]
Reception
According to Janis Hendrickson, "For someone familiar with the artist's oeuvre, the Studios could become mental playgrounds."[10] Waldman notes that "Perhaps the most significant aspect of the work is its retrospective nature and the decision by the artist to reflect on his life, past and present."[14] The small portion of the original that was cropped out was the majority of Mickey Mouse, emphasizing Donald Duck, who Graham Bader sees as Lichtenstein's metaphorical representation.[5]
See also
Notes
References
External links
Template:Roy Lichtenstein Template:Non-Disney works featuring Mickey Mouse
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Template:Cite book
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Template:Cite book
- ↑ Rondeau and Wagstaff. p. 73.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Rondeau and Wagstaff. p. 50.
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Template:Cite book
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Template:Cite book
- ↑ Rondeau and Wagstaff. p. 76.
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedRLOF51 - ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite web
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Rondeau and Wagstaff. pp. 73-4.